Hal Fan Hour

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 25 January 2010

Learning Styles and Work Styles

Posted on 13:52 by Unknown
Transcript of a Twitter exchange this afternoon on learning styles.

Downes: hmm: if there's no learning styles then there would be no working styles, just one best way to accomplish every task (which your boss knows)

nlowell: @Downes ok that has to be covered by one of your fallacies somewhere

opencontent: @Downes - Learning styles may exist - they just don't make any meaningful contribution to learning. E.g., http://bit.ly/66J4QJ

Downes @nlowell it's reasoning by analogy, so if there's a fallacy it'd be 'false analogy', which requires a relevant difference between the cases

nlowell:
@Downes I'm havning trouble w/relationship of "no learning/working styles" and "only one best way"

nlowell: @Downes Learning Style holds that I should ALWAYS learn best in one style. Content/context are irrelevant. Seems absurd on its face.

Downes:
@opencontent That doesn't save instruction either - "we cannot store up generalizations and constructs for ultimate assembly into a network"

DolorsCapdet:
@opencontent @Downes Learning styles determine the choice of the PLE

Downes: @nlowell I think we can all reject extreme single-point interpretations of learning style theory (and still agree people learn differently)

Downes:
Learning styles have historically been used to have an instructor 'select' an appropriate learning activity (and just as often get it wrong)

Downes: @DolorsCapdet But as Dolors says, learning styles are the ground and license to allow a learner to select his/her own learning activity

Downes: for if there are no learning styles, then there's only one learning style for each content, no matter who you are, and you should use that about

nlowell: @Downes No problem with rejecting single point interpretations, but doesn't that disallow identifying learners as VARK?

Downes: Doing a pretest may or may not help you understand your own style (probably not, with the usual unreliability of tests) but isn't predictive about 4 hours ago from web

nlowell: @Downes perhaps it's semantic but i'm failing to see the link between "no learning style" and "only one style for content"

geoffcain: @Downes Do you have any research on the selecting and getting it wrong bit? I only see learning styles used to ensure multimodal delivery.

Downes: @nlowell The point is that taxonomies like VARK are irrelevant; only instructivists try to test and prescribe; & anyway styles are complex

nlowell: @Downes agree re taxonomy but that appears to be the thrust of the application - instructivist, follow the recipe and learning happens.

scottbw: @Downes there is a big gap between accepting individual differences and asserting there are stable characteristics of individuals

Downes: @geoffcain on 'getting it wrong' - some evidence from the link @opencontent sent http://bit.ly/66J4QJ see also http://ow.ly/10eXs etc etc

Downes: @scottbw I don't need to assert there are stable difference between individuals, only that there ARE differences (these vary, of course)

scottbw:
@Downes "everyone learns differently, lets see what works for us here, in this time/place" vs. "aha, you're a type B7, you need module 28b"

Downes: It's just like working - sometimes I know I'll do better coding, others tweeting, or writing - it's hard to tell which on any given day...

Downes: what's wrong is making me work the same as everyone else, as if there's only one best way to do work having nothing to do with the worker

geoffcain: @Downes "The authors draw negative conclusions about a field they fail adequately to review," Mr. Sternberg says. I keep running into that!

Downes: @scottbw no, it's more like a recommender system; without learning styles you don't need a recommender, just assign module 2b to everyone

Downes: @scottbw or it's like having a music selector system on your iPod; without individual styles you may as well play everyone the same song

geoffcain: @Downes That article that seems to be against learning styles points to some strong research in favor via Sternberg.

georgeroberts: Hmm not if she's a good boss RT @Downes if no learning styles then no working styles, just 1 best way to do every task (which yr boss knows)


It ends there. Just as well; I had a meeting and people were tuning it out anyways. Twitter just isn't the venue for this sort of thing, clearly.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Blogs in Education
    Submission for a forthcoming STRIDE handbook for The Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU). See related handbooks here . What is a ...
  • Learning and Performance Support Systems
    This post is to introduce you to our Learning and Performance Support Systems program, a new $19 million 5-year initiative at the National R...
  • McLuhan - Understanding Media - Summary of Chapters 11-14
    My contribution to the Understanding Media Reading Group Chapter 11 McLuhan writes, in Chapter 11 of Understanding Media, that "The mys...
  • Making Up Facts
    I think I'll stop reading Willingham if he persists in making stuff up. He writes, "Prior knowledge is vital to comprehension beca...
  • Concepts
    On 2013-10-12 9:02 AM, Matthias Melcher wrote: If we consider, on one hand, all the aggregated connection patterns that make up a simple con...
  • On Populist Social Media, Twitter and Egypt
    Source: For the Right to Look Good observations : the members of the various lists you mention are among the smartest and most attentive peo...
  • Review: The Edupunks' Guide, by Anya Kamenetz
    I have now had the chance to read The Edupunks' Guide and can now form some opinions based on what I've seen. And if I were forced ...
  • The Large Industries, and Development
    Responding to David W. Campbell, Big Fish/Small Fish The small point first: could we have a link to Desjardin where he asserts "a caval...
  • When Words Lose Meaning
    In which I explain what I meant by my comment to this post from Doug Johnson. I commented, "If the word is not the thing, how do you e...
  • Where the Future Lies
    Responding to Durff's Blog In a post today I summarized Bill Cushard in Mindflash as follows: If I had to summarize the best advice I c...

Categories

  • #change11
  • Connectivism
  • http://www.blogger.com/img/gl.link.gif
  • Shakespeare

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (68)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2012 (56)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2011 (86)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (10)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ▼  2010 (108)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ▼  January (10)
      • The Most Important Question (2)
      • The Most Important Question
      • Learning Styles and Work Styles
      • Diffusion of an idea in the Blogosphere 2005 and 2010
      • Research Ethics
      • The ACOA Case
      • Content Delivery Networks
      • The Great Convergence
      • Avatar
      • Questioning Pedagogy
  • ►  2009 (85)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (94)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2007 (3)
    • ►  December (3)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile